No matter how often or loudly you claim otherwise, you are NOT submitting
yourselves to ANY Bible in existence today. ALL versions are fair game to be
changed, added to, or taken from. By definition and nature, you are making man
the authority over God's word rather than making God's word the authority over
men.
You do NOT believe God PRESERVED His word if you believe it's
scattered among innumerable Greek & Hebrew texts. That is a mockery of the
word preserve. If God preserves your soul the way you think He preserves His
word - you're in trouble. And God esteems His word higher than your
soul.
You say that scholars are going through mss. in an effort to
recreate what the originals said. If you accomplished that, how would you know?
You couldn't know - you have no originals to compare it with. I don't believe a
pure scripture necessarily has to match the originals (Matthew and Luke don't
match verbatim covering the same events), but I do believe it cannot conflict
with something that is pure scripture (i.e. KJV) - and every modern version I've
seen does conflict.
If God's word is scattered among all the mss. - if
scholars were able to piece back together a perfect text - how would you know?
Answer: you wouldn't. You'd change it again with the next scraps someone found
buried in the Middle East. In fact you've already done that by rejecting the KJV
as God's pure word.
If a lost soul asked you to show him the scripture,
as defined in the (ahem!) scripture (given by inspiration of God - therefore
perfect), you could not show it to him. You could only appeal to scholarship and
tell him "We almost might have something pretty close."
Second post:
If we read the Bible we see there is ONE true
God, ONE begotten Son, ONE true faith, ONE sacrifice for sins forever, ONE way
of salvation, ONE Saviour, ONE Holy Ghost, ONE body, ONE hope, etc.
etc.
Why would anyone with the spiritual discernment of a capuchin monkey
think there wouldn't be ONE perfect Bible?
No comments:
Post a Comment