Those of you who say that *all* the versions are pure scripture, but all versions have errors need to be honest that you are proposing an oxymoron that supercedes jumbo shrimp or government intelligence.
If you accept the words to mean what they mean without giving them personal definitions, you cannot have a "scripture" with error. Scripture is given by inspiration of God (God breathed). If you say that "scripture" has errors, you are accusing God of having bad breath. If you use the words honestly, you cannot say any version is scripture that has errors.
Likewise, you cannot rightly call something pure that is impure. The soap ad says 99 44/100 pure because it's not 100% pure. You should be honest enough to call your versions Soap Bibles if you believe they have errors. They cannot be pure if they have errors.
You can keep saying that you have the pure scripture, but unless you can show one that's errorless, you are not being honest in that claim. Only KJBOs are truly consistent with what we really believe when we say we have a "pure scripture".
You do not have "pure scripture" and by your posted beliefs of errors, I don't think you even have a Bible as pure as the soap.
I just want you to be honest with what you profess to believe. You cannot rightly profess to believe you have "pure scripture" if your "scripture" has more impurities than soap.
Please be honest enough to admit that and stop passing yourself off as "Bible believers" when there's no Bible you truly believe.
No comments:
Post a Comment